Quote:
Prove it. Prove that its the poor people that have a higher tendancy to place $100 on black than to by a $1 lottery ticket.
Prove that it is the poor man that would pass by 20 bars with video poker machines only to spend his last dime at a video poker machine in a casino.
Prove that a poor person would avoid TriState Greyhound Park like the plague but spend his child's milk money at a casino.
Just looking for some clarity...
You're attempting to justify a casino on the basis that the state already allows other forms of gambling? "They're already doing this, so why not permit them to do that?"
And are you also suggesting that even in having more lavish outlets for gambling, that people won't be any more inclined to spill their money then than they are now?
And finally... your definition of "prove" is what?... just so you don't set the definition so high that it can't reasonably be approached let alone met... and to be fair, just make sure it's a level of "proof" that you yourself can meet, otherwise you're only issuing the hollow challenge in the best Scott Farcas tradition.
Quote:
More nonsense. I guess that is why Casinos target ghettos and trailer parks instead of businessmen and suburbia. I guess that is why I see all these bums riding around in limos at Vegas. Yeah, if I build a $1.1 billion casino, the first place I would go to recoup my money is center city Philadelphia. Yeah, to heck with trying to get Michael Jordan to come spend his millions. I'd go after all the welfare recipients in WV first.
Is that why almost all of the casinos you've been so eager to mention were located outside of an urban area, ie where there is a sizeable middle class and upper class to appeal to?
What happens, Professor Blade, when a casino is located in an area where there is comparatively little middle and relatively no upper to appeal to?
And if you get MJ here before you get WV welfare recipients, then my man, (with acknowledgement to the judgment of Marco00 and any of his French colleagues
(Putting it at The Greenbrier is one thing... putting it in Hgtn or Chas or the Weston State Hospital (cough-cough-gag-gag-bellylaughter)... any of those is quite another.)
Quote:
There is nothing inherent, industrially speaking, in Snowshoe Resort, Myrtle Beach or the Grand Tetons either. To say that tourism is an artificial business one of the most foolish things I've ever heard. Period!
Indeed, tourism when you've got a unique ski slope, a particularly inviting beach, or a picturesque mountain range... those are far from artificial, and I would join you in calling that foolishness. One doesn't simply invent a reason for someone to go to one of those places... they are not synthetically appealing, they are naturally appealing.
(Can we get back to the subject now?... as I remember, we were talking about opening another McDonalds in Huntington... er, no... another Planet Hollywood... strike that, they went out of business... no, another Hard Rock Cafe'... ahhh... no, I remember... another CASINO... another "UNIQUE" casino, unlike all the others... one that EVERYONE will want to fly to WV to come to...)
Quote:
Geesh sturt, taking about a house of cards! The internet! Yahoo with a combined net worth of $12 dollars and 50 cents is making billions in the market. Granted, real property is not the only way to create value but the gaming industry has billions of dollars more real property than the e businesses.
You are speaking with no real facts and calling people out for the same. That's my strut!
So, the "real facts" are that I should gauge the future of e-commerce on your singular stock quote for Yahoo?
Isn't that a little like going back 25 years ago and yucking up the potential of the fast-food industry based on the stock price of McDonald's back when?
Thanks for setting me straight, Professor.
Forgive me... I've got to go order some xmas presents from Amazon now... (you should try it sometime... it's really great for those of us who despise going to shop at "real properties"

